# BDOW! Alternatives for Popup Forms, Newsletters and Multiple Sites
Compare BDOW! (formerly Sumo) alternatives for native newsletters, signup forms, split tests and additional sites. See task scores and monthly costs.
- Page: https://popuppapa.com/alternatives-to-bdow/
- Updated: 2026-11-05
## Why are you switching from BDOW!?
What would stop working if you took the BDOW! script off your site tonight? A publisher may lose a Smart Bar but still have its entire newsletter in Mailchimp. Another may still receive submissions from an embedded form yet lose the confirmation message, subscriber list and weekly send. The first publisher has a design change to make. The second has a mailing service to move.
Start with Poptin Growth if you need a small list and its welcome messages under one roof. Look at Getsitecontrol if the form is becoming a sales enquiry with different questions for different customers. If the real expense is putting one simple notice on several sites, compare Hello Bar and Elfsight before moving a single subscriber.
[Keep sending newsletters](#for-email)
## What BDOW! gets right and where it falls short
BDOW! Pro buys a useful combination for a single publication. A reader can open a signup from a bar or scroll box, submit an address, confirm by email and receive subsequent newsletters. The publisher can run a split test on the form and send frequently to a relatively small stored list. For a weekly and a daily edition with the same readership, the native sending allowance makes frequency a less important buying variable than list size.
Its targeting can also account for previous subscribers and opted-out visitors. That matters after a migration. A reader who has dismissed the invitation for months should not suddenly see it across every archive page simply because the new script has never seen their browser.
Pro covers one website and includes storage for 1,000 contacts. Beyond that allowance, new signups can still go to a connected mailing service. Extra storage matters if BDOW! itself must retain and email those readers. A second website requires its own Pro subscription. Legacy Free users should also check their account notice about November 9, 2026. Decide which of the paid tools the site will actually use before rebuilding for the sake of an introductory price.
[BDOW! review and plans](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/bdow/index.md)
## BDOW! alternatives by reason for switching
Each group uses the directory score out of 100 for that particular job. The first row gives you BDOW! as a reference. A lower-scoring tool can still be the best choice when it solves the particular problem behind the move.
### Keep the newsletter and its welcome sequence together
A confirmation request, the email that delivers a download and next Tuesday’s newsletter do three different things. Start with a fresh subscriber on the existing site. Note when the address becomes eligible for a broadcast and what starts the first automated message. A replacement that sends a notification to the site owner has covered none of the subscriber-facing work.
Poptin Growth is a useful comparison for a publication where one confirmed subscription starts a short series. Getsitecontrol suits a team that wants to branch the enquiry before deciding which message to send. Klaviyo makes more sense when purchase history or profile properties decide which edition a customer receives.
Price the most active ordinary month as well as the size of the list. BDOW! includes unlimited native sends on Pro. With another service the second newsletter in a busy week can increase the bill while the list stays the same size. A better editor has to be worth the difference for that particular publication.
BDOW!**51.31**
#### [Poptin](#poptin)
61.16
Start a Growth automation on confirmed subscription and check the contact allowance for the existing list.
[BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md)
#### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
76.83
Follow a choice in the form into an email workflow. Include sending credits in the quote.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
#### [Klaviyo](#klaviyo)
77.78
Use the same subscriber profile for the signup, audience segment and subsequent customer flow.
[Klaviyo review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/klaviyo/index.md)
[Compare all tools for this profile](https://popuppapa.com/?priority=email#directory)
### Replace only the onsite forms and keep the mailing list
Open the destination settings on a BDOW! campaign before you copy its design. A site-wide list may be overridden on a single form. A footer newsletter invitation and a workshop registration can collect the same email address while promising entirely different follow-up.
Getsitecontrol is a good first trial when those promises depend on the answers. Elfsight is economical to investigate when the existing recipient is Mailchimp and the site has only a few widgets. Hello Bar is the closest visual starting point for a publication built around a slim invitation above its articles.
Try one returning subscriber as well as a fresh address. An existing reader should be able to register for a workshop without receiving the newsletter welcome gift a second time. Inspect both the contact and the actual message the destination sends.
BDOW!**51.09**
#### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
74.52
Map each form’s answers to the destination fields the existing sender already reads.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
#### [Elfsight](#elfsight)
40.95
Use a conditional field and the Mailchimp connection for a small collection of embedded campaigns.
[Elfsight review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
#### [Hello Bar](#hellobar)
55.53
Keep an article invitation in a bar and send the subscriber to the existing list.
[BDOW! vs Hello Bar](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-hellobar/index.md)
[Compare all tools for this profile](https://popuppapa.com/?priority=popups#directory)
### Collect enough information to hand an enquiry to sales
A publisher can get by with an email address. A wholesaler may need a company, role and order size before anyone knows who should answer. BDOW! already accepts text, choices and hidden context. Count the requests that require a second email just to qualify the person before buying a new form.
Try Getsitecontrol when a retail visitor should skip the wholesale questions entirely. Poptin is worth testing if the sales inbox fills with personal or mistyped addresses. Elfsight can reveal a field after a particular answer and is a credible lower-cost comparison for a straightforward brief.
A single form can serve a sales request and a newsletter signup, but permission to answer an enquiry and permission to market to that person are different. Submit one of each. Check that the sales team sees the original question and that the newsletter audience contains the people who requested it.
BDOW!**49.2**
#### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
79.14
Give trade enquiries their own question path and carry the answers into a contact field.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
#### [Poptin](#poptin)
68.33
Test email validation with the kinds of bad entries that currently reach the sales team.
[BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md)
#### [Elfsight](#elfsight)
41.08
Reveal a relevant follow-up field and pass the result to Mailchimp or a webhook.
[Elfsight review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
[Compare all tools for this profile](https://popuppapa.com/?priority=leads#directory)
### Find out what the popup changed beyond its signup rate
BDOW! lets an operator split traffic between variants and compare conversions. For a publication testing two headlines on the same download, staying can be a rational choice. A different experiment begins when the question is whether a discount or interruption should exist at all.
OptiMonk deserves a trial for that second question because a control group can see no popup. Poptin is a reasonable comparison for two signup designs and a consistent downstream definition of a lead. Getsitecontrol lets a team compare variants of a form whose paths have different commercial value.
Decide in advance what counts as a win. A gated download might lift submissions and reduce paid subscriptions if it distracts readers from the offer they originally came for. Trace the paid subscription back to the experiment assignment before declaring the version with more downloads the winner.
BDOW!**29.73**
#### [OptiMonk](#optimonk)
57.89
Compare exposed and unexposed visitors when deciding whether to keep a promotion.
[OptiMonk review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/optimonk/index.md)
#### [Poptin](#poptin)
39.34
Run two versions of the invitation and count qualified contacts under the same rule.
[BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md)
#### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
52.91
Test two paths through an enquiry and compare the quality of the resulting leads.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
[Compare all tools for this profile](https://popuppapa.com/?priority=experiments#directory)
### Give each publication or client the right account access
In BDOW! an administrator can manage billing and users. Site access and additional site subscriptions matter when a freelancer edits a regional publication for a month. Moving everyone into one login can turn a purchasing decision into a permissions problem.
Poptin Agency is worth a look for separate client subaccounts and reporting. Getsitecontrol suits a publisher that distinguishes widget editing from activation. Elfsight offers project-level sharing on eligible plans when the collaborator’s job is editing a small widget collection.
Use two test publications. Let a contributor update the Friday announcement for the first, then see what the second publication and its billing details look like to that account. Include the person who must remove access after the contract ends in this exercise.
BDOW!**58.49**
#### [Poptin](#poptin)
69.64
Compare private subaccounts and scoped statistics for clients with separate reporting needs.
[BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md)
#### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
68.72
Separate editing from activation when the final decision belongs to a publication owner.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
#### [Elfsight](#elfsight)
43.51
Use project sharing where an editor only needs to maintain existing widgets.
[Elfsight review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
[Compare all tools for this profile](https://popuppapa.com/?priority=teams#directory)
### Run sales and download campaigns without asking for email
A BDOW! CTA can take a visitor straight to a page. For a publisher announcing a ticket release, submitting a form would add friction and give the event manager the wrong measurement. The useful number may be trips to the ticket page, followed by actual bookings there.
Hello Bar works well as a comparison for a persistent top or bottom notice. Getsitecontrol is worth testing when the invitation changes with the audience or, on Shopify, a button should change the cart. Elfsight can display the interruption or link on selected pages when the publishing team needs just a few variations.
Try the sold-out state as well as the live one. A scheduled end can remove an expired invitation. An event that sells out early needs someone with access to take the link down while leaving the rest of the site and the mailing program alone.
BDOW!**47.3**
#### [Hello Bar](#hellobar)
53.07
Keep a short announcement in view and direct interested readers to the event page.
[BDOW! vs Hello Bar](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-hellobar/index.md)
#### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
67.74
Test the required button action on a real product or destination page.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
#### [Elfsight](#elfsight)
34.89
Compare a small set of scheduled notices under a predictable widget-slot allowance.
[Elfsight review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
[Compare all tools for this profile](https://popuppapa.com/?priority=actions#directory)
### Collect useful answers from readers who never join the list
An editor deciding which beat to fund may want every answer to a readership survey. A list manager needs addresses with permission to send. BDOW! can ask written and choice questions, so first establish whether the missing piece is question design, the export or the ability to count answers without identifying their authors.
Hello Bar has scale and star questions with a progress indicator. Getsitecontrol is useful when a low score should open a follow-up. Elfsight can expose a specific field and send the resulting entry onward. Give each candidate a survey that a visitor can finish without volunteering for the newsletter.
Put the response count beside the contact count when you evaluate the result. An editor can learn from an anonymous reader. Turning a successful survey into a disappointing signup campaign on paper is an easy way to replace a tool that was doing its job.
BDOW!**38.06**
#### [Hello Bar](#hellobar)
45.85
Use a rating or a short questionnaire when the editor needs comparable responses.
[BDOW! vs Hello Bar](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-hellobar/index.md)
#### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
74.61
Ask a dissatisfied reader for detail without lengthening every respondent’s survey.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
#### [Elfsight](#elfsight)
34.31
Collect a written response and use conditional visibility for an optional follow-up.
[Elfsight review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
[Compare all tools for this profile](https://popuppapa.com/?priority=feedback#directory)
## BDOW! alternatives ranked by overall rating
These overall scores cover the whole toolkit. Read the profile of any contender you would consider moving to.
### Getsitecontrol · 72.87
### Papa’s take
I’d choose the live form that keeps sending enquiries to the wrong person. Rebuild its two most common paths and inspect the final records. If sales can act on both immediately, compare that saving with the separate cost of email sends.
Getsitecontrol makes a strong case when forms and subsequent emails belong to one operator. A workshop attendee and a wholesale lead can answer different questions and enter different workflows. Give the office member who handles each request a sample entry before you judge the editor.
There is also a simpler case for a busy publication that shows one offer to very few readers. Getsitecontrol prices widget displays per site. Compare actual exposure and email volume against BDOW!’s stored contacts and unlimited sends. A daily newsletter and a rarely seen popup can pull this calculation in opposite directions.
[Getsitecontrol review and plans](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
### Klaviyo · 68.56
### Papa’s take
I’d look at the first two messages after a signup and ask what could make the second one different. If the answer is a purchase or a stated preference, build that branch. If everyone gets the same weekly issue, price a full sending month first.
Klaviyo is particularly attractive when BDOW! already feeds a Klaviyo list. A native form can write the property and join the list that starts the current flow. Match the property type as well as its name. A text answer that looks like a number can behave differently in a segment.
For someone moving the entire mailing program the important inventory includes suppression, consent and pending confirmations. An export of addresses does not tell the new sender which of those people may receive the next issue. Start with one small audience and compare its expected recipients before scheduling a broadcast.
[Klaviyo review and plans](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/klaviyo/index.md)
### OptiMonk · 60.42
### Papa’s take
I’d pick a promotion that finance already suspects is too generous. Include people who see no discount and follow orders through to margin. If the decision is simply which signup headline gets more readers, a publisher already paying for BDOW! Pro can run that experiment on its existing subscription.
OptiMonk is a specialist shortlist entry for a store that wants evidence about what would have happened without the offer. Compare the whole assigned audience. Counting only people who redeem a code excludes the customers who would have ordered at full price.
Allow time to reproduce targeting and suppression. If the comparison group can encounter the same coupon in another popup, the test no longer answers the original question. Keep the newsletter where it is during this experiment so a change in welcome emails does not obscure the result.
[OptiMonk review and plans](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/optimonk/index.md)
### Poptin · 58.03
### Papa’s take
I’d bring the person who sends the newsletter to the Growth trial. Have them confirm one address tomorrow, long after the signup, and see which email arrives. If the answer is correct, look at client access and next month’s combined traffic and list bill.
Poptin has two buying decisions that can look like one. Its popup plans count visitors. Growth adds email and automation with a contact allowance. A BDOW! operator who already sends elsewhere can compare the onsite plans first. Someone replacing a native list needs to budget for both collection and follow-up.
An agency should go one step further. Give two test clients separate reporting access and check that each can retrieve only its own report. Central administration saves time when the clients remain independently manageable. It can create more work when the agency has to split a combined export every Friday.
[BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md) · [Poptin review and plans](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/poptin/index.md)
### Hello Bar · 44.17
### Papa’s take
I’d try Hello Bar on a publication that needs a permanent place for a short announcement. Put it on a long article and a short landing page, then read both on your phone. Its value depends on the space it takes away as much as the clicks it wins.
Hello Bar covers several familiar BDOW! surfaces, including bars, overlays and text-only notices. It also offers surveys and prize campaigns if the publication later wants audience input. For a store with an established email service, this can be enough to replace the onsite portion without touching the list.
Paid split testing and recurring view capacity matter when a bar appears across an entire archive. A free editor is a convenient way to assess the layout. Use the paid allowance for a regular publishing schedule and include the existing email provider in the comparison.
[BDOW! vs Hello Bar](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-hellobar/index.md) · [Hello Bar review and plans](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/hellobar/index.md)
### Elfsight · 29.02
### Papa’s take
I’d count the widgets first. Three evergreen forms on a quiet site are one purchase. Separate versions for six publications, each edited by someone different, are another. Price both the widget slots and the permissions before moving your first embed.
Elfsight Popup is a practical replacement for a handful of notices or conditional forms. A field can appear after a particular choice, and a form can send an autoresponse or deliver the entry to Mailchimp. That immediate reply works for a requested file. Recurring newsletters still need a sender.
A widget load can count even when its rules prevent a visible popup. Check where the embed is installed. A form used on one contact page and a script loaded throughout the archive can yield very different usage figures even if the same number of people eventually open the form.
[Elfsight review and plans](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
## Five switching decisions in practice
### 1\. A reader confirms after the old form is gone
Someone signs up on Thursday, then opens the confirmation email after Friday’s migration. Try that sequence with a test address before retiring the old subscription. Establish which system recognises the confirmation and how the address reaches the new list.
Send a second request through the replacement form. Two functioning confirmation links still need to produce one eligible subscriber, one welcome message and a usable unsubscribe route.
[BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md)
### 2\. A workshop registrant already receives the newsletter
A returning reader registers for a class. BDOW!’s form-specific destination may add that person to the workshop list even if they already exist on the publication list. The replacement should preserve that registration and avoid sending last year’s welcome gift.
Inspect the event or membership the reminder reads. A generic contact update proves the address exists. It takes the workshop date, registration status and reminder delivery to prove the person has a seat.
[Klaviyo review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/klaviyo/index.md)
### 3\. The sponsor buys a notice for only one section
The sponsor bought exposure beside travel articles. Installing a widget everywhere and restricting display to travel can satisfy the creative brief while consuming a different load allowance. Compare a section-only embed with a global embed using the same display rule.
Ask the sponsor whether the invoice is based on visible notices or traffic to the section. Agree on the report before the first impression, particularly if those totals come from different systems.
[Elfsight review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
### 4\. A client leaves while a draft is awaiting approval
Copy the outgoing client’s campaign inventory, destination lists and expiry dates. An editor may know which draft is correct, but a separate approver must be able to publish or cancel it after the handover.
Practice on a test website. Revoke the agency editor, activate the approved version from the client account, and submit an enquiry. Delivery into an agency-owned inbox is a handover defect even when access to the editor has been transferred successfully.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
### 5\. Downloads go up while paid subscriptions stand still
Half the readers see a free guide and the rest see the normal subscription invitation. Separate downloading the guide from starting a paid subscription. A bigger mailing list can be valuable, but it does not establish that the offer sold more subscriptions.
Allow both groups the same follow-up window. A Monday launch and a Friday launch would otherwise give one group substantially more time to buy.
[OptiMonk review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/optimonk/index.md)
## What would switching from BDOW! cost?
A one-site publisher with a modest list may send many editions without a higher BDOW! native sending charge. Compare the same confirmed subscribers and the same number of sends in each alternative. Include the separate mail service if a candidate only supplies the form.
### Count websites, stored contacts and actual sends
Take a daily edition and a monthly digest with the same audience size. Their storage requirements look similar. Their sending budgets can be far apart. Now add a second website with its own editor. BDOW! requires another Pro subscription for the site, and a multi-site competitor may charge for traffic or permissions instead.
### Signup plus an automated welcome email
Capture contacts and send an automated welcome email in the same product; 1 website, 1,000 visitors and 2,000 pageviews per month; 500 active contacts and 1,000 emails per month; monthly billing.
| Tool | Monthly price for this workload | What the quote covers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [BDOW! pricing](https://app.bdow.com/pricing) | $25 · Pro monthly | Pro includes signup welcome emails, 1,000 stored contacts and unlimited native sends; 500 contacts and 1,000 welcome emails fit. |
| [Poptin pricing](https://www.poptin.com/pricing/) | $19 · Growth · 500 contacts | Free stops at 250 active contacts and 500 emails; Growth includes automations and unlimited emails. |
| [Getsitecontrol pricing](https://getsitecontrol.com/pricing/) | $2 · Free + 1,000 email credits | Free supports welcome automations and unlimited contacts. 1,000 recurring sends cost $2; one-time signup credits are excluded. |
| [Elfsight pricing](https://elfsight.com/popup-widget/pricing/) | No confirmed monthly quote | A form autoresponder is listed, but a plan covering 500 active contacts and 1,000 monthly welcome emails is not established. |
### Two websites on one account
This second example isolates the cost of operating two sites with no email sends. Add the actual newsletter volume and any client access requirements after identifying which subscription can cover both domains.
Capacity only: 2 domains, combined 10,000 unique visitors × 2 pages = 20,000 pageviews, zero contacts/sends; monthly billing; no cross-domain deduplication assumed.
| Tool | Monthly price for this workload | What the quote covers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [BDOW! pricing](https://app.bdow.com/pricing) | $50 · 2 × Pro monthly | Both sites can be managed in one account, but each needs its own $25 monthly Pro subscription. |
| [Poptin pricing](https://app.popt.in/) | $59 · Pro | Basic allows only one website. Pro includes four, so it fits both sites even though their traffic is modest. |
| [Getsitecontrol pricing](https://getsitecontrol.com/pricing/) | $38 · Pro × 2 sites | Multiple sites require a paid plan. Two Pro site subscriptions cost $19 each; each includes 100,000 widget views. |
| [Elfsight pricing](https://elfsight.com/popup-widget/pricing/) | $12 · Pro | The two websites generate 20,000 combined widget loads, within Pro’s 50,000 at $12 monthly. Paid plans allow unlimited websites; nine widget slots cover a widget on each site. |
## When I’d keep BDOW!
Keep BDOW! when one publisher runs one site, sends frequently to a manageable list and already trusts the confirmation and unsubscribe paths. The time spent transferring permission records and pending messages belongs in the comparison alongside the recurring price.
If the urgent problem is the end of a legacy plan, inspect the current publication’s usage before committing to a rebuild. A single paid month may give the editor enough time to export contacts, test one alternative and decide with actual recipient counts.
## BDOW! head-to-head comparisons
These scores are calculated for each pair. Read across one row to compare two tools under the same criteria.
| Matchup | BDOW! | Opponent | What the comparison helps you decide |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md) | 15.99 | 38.15 · Poptin | Which subscription covers both the client’s forms and the welcome messages its readers actually receive? |
| [Alia vs BDOW!](https://popuppapa.com/alia-vs-bdow/index.md) | 25.33 | 25.05 · Alia | Is the offer a Shopify signup incentive or the beginning of a newsletter you will send yourself? |
| [BDOW! vs Picreel](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-picreel/index.md) | 24.34 | 15.09 · Picreel | Are you keeping an exit invitation, or the double opt-in list and emails behind it? |
| [BDOW! vs Hello Bar](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-hellobar/index.md) | 23.22 | 19.32 · Hello Bar | Will a bar with an external sender cover the publication, or do the subscriber list and newsletters need to move too? |
## Overall verdict · Three alternatives to BDOW!
Poptin Growth gets the first trial for a publisher replacing both popups and a modest mailing program. Getsitecontrol earns its place when improving the enquiry itself matters most. Elfsight is the economical shortlist entry for a few forms feeding a sender you already own. Their overall scores give context to three quite different purchases.
### [Poptin](#poptin)
58.03
For forms and welcome emails
Compare the Growth contact allowance, confirmation trigger and real sending volume with the list currently stored in BDOW!.
[BDOW! vs Poptin](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md)
### [Getsitecontrol](#getsitecontrol)
72.87
For better sales enquiries
Branch the form, pass the sales team usable fields and price the sends that follow.
[Getsitecontrol review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/getsitecontrol/index.md)
### [Elfsight](#elfsight)
29.02
For a small set of widgets
Keep the mailing service and compare the price of the few conditional forms or notices the site actually needs.
[Elfsight review](https://popuppapa.com/reviews/elfsight/index.md)
## Related articles
[### BDOW! vs Poptin
Compare popup-only plans, native sends and independent client accounts.](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-poptin/index.md)
·
[### BDOW! vs Hello Bar
Compare an announcement bar with a complete newsletter signup path.](https://popuppapa.com/bdow-vs-hellobar/index.md)
·
[### Popup tools for Mailchimp
Check which form fields and subscription settings reach an existing Mailchimp list.](https://popuppapa.com/mailchimp-popup-integrations/index.md)